Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Happy Pakistan Day - Part II

Continued from my last post Happy Pakistan Day
Having seen ample evidence that Lahore Resolution was not the “only one” of its kind and the first proposal of partition, it becomes imperative now to examine the Resolution in further detail. How the truths about this Resolution have been distorted deliberately has a lot to do with today’s Pakistan. The fall-out of this distortion and outright murder of history, on Pakistan and its relation with neighboring India today is beyond the level we can imagine.
The textbooks and reinforcing media messages, owned completely by the state and the people, claim that the Resolution was adopted on this twenty-third day of March of the year nineteen hundred and forty. No lie can be whiter than this! According to the Proceedings of the 27th Annual Session of All India Muslim League, a Reception Committee was established for receiving the delegates. The “Nawab” of Mamdot was the Chairman of this Committee who opened the session on March 22, 1940 with a short address at 3:00 pm. His address was followed by Mr. Jinnah’s long speech, which for a change was not written, who was presiding over the session. The session was adjourned after this speech only to be re-met on March 23, 1940 at 3:00 pm.
At the beginning of the second day March 23, Maulvi Fazl-e-Haq of Bengal introduced the resolution, which was seconded by Chaudhri Khaliquzzaman. Both of them spoke on the Resolution for a while after which Zafar Ali Khan, Sardar Aurangzeb Khan and Sir Abdullah Haroon delivered their speeches (names are in the order of their speeches).  The session was then adjourned again to be met the next day. On March 24, 1940, the session began in the morning at 11:15 am. A non-interactive discussion on the Resolution started with the speeches of Leagui leaders from United Provinces, Balochistan and Madras. Till this time Mr. Jinnah was not present on the occasion. After the speech of Abdul Hamid Khan, Jinnah entered the venue and took the Presiding seat. Speeches in favour of the Resolution continued by other leaders. After another hour and a half, Jinnah intervened and let another resolution on Palestine to be introduced to the house. After a few speeches in favour of this second resolution, the session adjourned to be re-met at 9:00 pm the same night.
In the night session, two more speeches were made by Sayyid Zakir Ali and Begum Mohammad Ali – the only woman speaker of the occasion – in favour of the Lahore Resolution before the announcement of vote by show of hand. The Resolution was adopted although, without any dissenting vote –meaning unanimously. Two more resolutions were moved and passed without discussion afterwards, one on the Khaksaars and other on the amendment to Party’s constitution. After which, office bearers of All India Muslim League, for the next year were elected. The session was, then wound up at 11:30 pm by Mr Jinnah with a short concluding speech. So the Resolution Day that we commemorate on March 23, was actually passed (adopted) a litter earlier than the midnight between March 24 and 25, 1940.
You must be, dear reader, wondering why so much ranting about just a date? The date can very conveniently have been changed from the texts had it been an error of misprinting or typology. But there’s much more to it. For the reminder of posterity, may I recall here when Pakistan was created. Was it a day earlier than the Independence of India on 15th of August 1947? Another lie. Both the countries became dominions of the Crown of England simultaneously at the midnight between August 14 and 15, 1947. Our India-centric leadership decided to mark August 14 as the “Creation of Pakistan” day as distinction from Indian Independence Day.
But how is it related to our twenty-third day of March celebrations? A great deal. We did NOT get independence on Aug 14, 1947. We were still under the crown, observing the colonial law as our constitution (Government of India Act 1935). This made it impending on both the juvenile nation states to make and promulgate their constitution to grant themselves “Independence”. India did that in 1949 – right after 26 months of partition. They passed it o n Nov 26, 1949 and promulgated on Jan 26, 1950, which to date stands as the longest written constitution of any independent state of the world. They celebrate this day as their Republic Day.
Pakistan could, for reasons understandable, do it in 1955. We were able to promulgate it on the twenty-third day of March 1956, which became since then, our Republican day. The Yaum-e-Jamhooriya Pakistan – Pakistan Republican Day. The nation was happy although it did not have any say in authorship of that constitution but still it made them free from British Crown forever. We started commemorating it every year since then. And then a soldier came to reign in, on October 1958. The soldier felt ridiculous on the eve of third Republican Day, March 1959 to commemorate the birth of a constitution he himself had abrogated. His advisors came up with the idea to slightly twist the reason to celebrate. Thence the Republican Day of Pakistan became Pakistan Day.
What pains me is, how easily the people of Pakistan let them go scot-free. Today when we are living in a democratic independent state, we still are carrying on this farce. We still do not realize how this lie has impacted our psyches. We’re deliberately keeping ourselves oblivious. We are just not bothered. Little do we realize that an honest account of history is an undeniable right of posterity. We have committed a crime against time without realizing that it can prove too ferocious and vengeful an enemy if taken lightly!
In the next post, we’ll analyze the contents of the Lahore Resolution to make head and tail of what our leaders wanted out of that.

Happy Pakistan Day - Part I


Every year when this day approaches, a rampant euphoria that engulfs the air makes me increasingly nervous about our collective intelligence to understand history and putting it in perspective. Whereas one can differ on varying approaches on how to interpret history and applied to the current situations – déjà vu or sui generis – but statement of facts in a manner that doesn’t compromise factual correctness, can not be overemphasized. It is not difficult to ascertain how crucial it could become in engineering the psyche of a whole generation and changing the course of events for all the times to come. Even if it is as little a thing, as changing the dates of events!

This twenty third day of March is invariably painted in all the media around us, as “Pakistan Day”. Little does the term offer for a toddler to understand what the term means? I say toddler because this little piece of information I saw my daughter memorize when she was not even in grade one. And that was the day that I decided state run schools and even the private schools that are made to follow state prescribed curriculum are just not the place for my daughter’s education. I wonder why people of Pakistan let their children become the fodder of wrong state propaganda, through poorly conceived textbooks, so easily? I’ve been shrieking at the top of my throat since now almost a decade that these text books are telling white lies to our children who’re growing with strange notions and hollow rhetoric. No one is moved. Not even for the sake of our posterity. So much to talk of responsible parenting!
Sorry for this digression, thanks to my state of mind after almost a life time struggle for truth! So my dear reader, we were to talk about twenty-third day of March. Here is how a textbook for grade 12 describes Pakistan Day:


For those who can’t read Persian transcript, the transliteration would be:
“Annual Session of All India Muslim League was held on 23rd March 1940 at the historical Iqbal of Lahore. Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah presided it over and a large number of Muslims from all over India participated. Maulvi Fazl-e-Haq of Bengal Province presented a resolution with the title Lahore Resolution and the participants adopted the resolution amid loud slogans. Muslims had determined their destination. That was a historical day. Mianr-e-Pakistan has been built in Iqbal Park to keep the memories of that day alive”.
What a farce! This is a Punjab Text Book Board textbook for grade 12, whose authors are some Mr Mohammad Farooq Malik, Dr Sultan Khan, Rai Faiz and Khadim Ali Khan. The book has been published by Punjab Textbook Board Lahore printed by Malik House Ganpat Road Lahore. It does neither tell the date of printing nor the number of printed copies. On the first page however, it carries messages from General (the then President of the country) Pervez Musharraf and Chaudhry Pervez Ilahi (the then Chief Minister of Punjab).
These two messages tell that it must have been printed sometime between 2002 and 2007, and must have been in force since atleast three years. I’m amazed that there’s no one from amongst the parents who could be at least as much conscious about their children’s education, as to ask at least about the authors! There’s just no mention of where the authors come from, what’s their profile etc.
All this aside, come to the twenty-third day discussion.
The quoted passage is not the only instance. This propaganda is being done at state level, at media level and in all public spheres. The notification of public holiday on March 23 every year also tells that the day marks “Pakistan Resolution”’s adoption in 1940.
Let me challenge this sheer rape of history in clearest of terms. The said resolution is not Pakistan Resolution, One. It is very clearly named Lahore Resolution in all the documents that record the happenings of that year (1940). The evidence can be had in 12-volume compilation The Partition Papers, kept in India Office Library London. The other document that could be consulted is the Proceedings of All India Muslim League’s 27th Annual Session, kept in National Archives of Pakistan.
Secondly, the Day is commemorated as if the said resolution came as a shock in which a “separate country for Muslims” was demanded. It didn’t. One can quote several dozen proposals of partition, with different details, prior to this Resolution year (1940). Whereas the Muslims may continue to fool themselves by asserting that the idea of separation was home grown by the Muslims of India starting from the era of Sayyid Ahmad Khan, the facts will remain facts. The idea of separation in terms of establishing five or six presidencies with complete autonomy and ultimately becoming independent states first came in 1858. Hold your breath, the author was John Bright, not (Sir) Sayyid Ahmad Khan! John Bright while speaking in House of Commons on June 24, 1858 elaborated on his ideas of the solution to Indian problem during the debate on Government of India Bill.
Knighted by the English, Sayyid Ahmad Khan took forward the idea and started with his famous “Muslims and Hindus are two separate nations” in 1867 as probably a prelude to the physical partition of Indian nation into two religious nationalities. It had to be this way. People had to be convinced of their being “different” before they were physically and territorially separated. The idea then started growing with at least a dozen different proposals till the turn of century. The authors of partition included Joh Bright, Sayyid Ahmad Khan, Jamaluddin “Afghani”, Theodore Beck, Abdul Halim Sharar, Theodore Morison. In the 20th century more than 155 proposals of partition with different details were carried forward till the day of adoption of Lahore Resolution in 1940. The 20th century campaign was, interestingly, started by Bhai Parmanand, a well meaning leader of Hindu Mahasabha with a statement, “Divide India on Hindu-Muslim lines” in 1904. Since then, Hindu Mahasabha could not liberate itself with the idea of partition. Although this idea saw multiplication by many other Muslim, British and Hindu leaders of the time including Akbar Allahabadi, Mohammad Ali (Johar), Joseph Stalin, Hasrat Mohani etc. Almost seventy different proposal had already been taken rounds in media, public discourse and corridors of power before Chaudhry Rehmat Ali distributed his much talked about Pamphlet in 1933.
In the backdrop of the above information gathered from a host of sources, it seems ridiculous to take 1940 as the origin of the idea of Pakistan, the information shamelessly transferred to the children in Pakistan.
Continued

Mian Nawaz Sharif in the Court

In Court With Nawaz Sharif
This account was published in Time Asia on November 22, 1999. Posted on Baaghi for the sake of revisiting immediate history that seems to somehow dissolve in the air and put the people in amnesia so often. Read, think and decide!

By GHULAM HASNAIN Karachi


Muhammed Nawaz Sharif was clearly disoriented and depressed as he stepped into the courtroom on Friday afternoon. For a moment, he seemed on the verge of breaking down in tears -- his eyes were moist. "Where should I sit?" he asked one of his lawyers. He was shown a chair in the back.
When the formal proceedings began, Judge Rehman Husain Jafri asked Sharif if he had been tortured by the police. Sharif replied: "I was in solitary confinement for the last 38 days. In these days I never encountered any policemen." However, he said he had been interrogated by officials from other government agencies. 
Jafri: The scope [of this trial] is quite limited. Police say you were arrested at 12:05 a.m. on Nov. 19.
Sharif: No, I was in solitary confinement for the last 38 days.
Jafri: That is a different subject. You can tell this when the actual trial will begin. This is not linked.
Sharif: Sir, I think it is linked.
Jafri: Were you tortured in custody?
Sharif: They did not beat me. But there are other things. If asked, I will tell you. Except torture they did everything.
Jafri: Do you know the charges?
Sharif: I have no idea what the charges are.
The judge read the charges--of treason, hijacking a commercial airliner and endangering the lives of 200 passengers.
Sharif: This is the first time I am hearing this.
After this exchange, the judge heard from lawyers for the defense and the prosecution. During this period, I managed to ask Sharif a few questions. Seeing me take notes, security in the courtroom signaled me to get out, but they didn't approach me for fear of interrupting the trial.
TIME: Did you order the hijacking?
Sharif: You hijack a plane with a gun. It is the democratically elected government which has been hijacked. It is the democracy which has been hijacked. Parliament has been hijacked. It is the 140 million people who have been hijacked. Who says plane was hijacked? There was no hijacking.
TIME: So what happened on Oct. 12? Did you sack army chief Pervez Musharraf?
Sharif: The coming moments will unfold everything. You will know soon what actually happened on that day. The thing which has to be found out is whether it was the coup which came first or the orders to the aircraft.
TIME: Do you expect justice and a fair trial?
Sharif: It will soon be clear. Everything will be in front of you.
TIME: Do you fear the military regime will hang you, as they did in the case of Zulfikar Bhutto?
Sharif: Let's see. I have left everything in the hands of God.
TIME: Where have you been since the coup?
Sharif: They kept shifting me to different places. I was kept in small rooms. Dingy rooms. I can't explain it to you in words. Seeing is believing. There was no mineral water. Each time I had to request them to fetch me mineral water. The supply of running water in the room was erratic. I was kept away from TV and newspapers. I had telephonic conversation with my family only twice. I don't know what is happening to them. I was totally in the dark.
TIME: What was the attitude of your captors toward you?
Sharif: It varied place to place. Each time you face different people. And they treat you in a different manner.
TIME: How long do you think this will continue?
Sharif: Let's see.
After hearing from lawyers on both sides, Judge Jafri handed Sharif over to police custody for interrogation till Nov. 22. He was taken away in an armored personnel carrier to an unknown destination. Sharif had been in court about 40 minutes.

Postscript: On Saturday, security officials didn't allow newsmen anywhere near the court--we were even barred from standing on the main road outside. 

From the Forgotten Archives: Question Mark for Judiciary, Army & Media



This article was posted on the website of The South Asia Tribune (Issue No 54, August 10-16, 2003). SAT was a web news portal run and edited by Mr Shaheen Sehbai, now Group Editor of the Jang Group, who was at daggers drawn with Musharraf led army at that point in time. So fierce were his writings that he had to flee the country and take refuge in USA. Many suspect, that he did it to get green card for him and family. Once he got the much wanted green cards, threat to his life suddenly ended and he came back during same Musharraf regime and joined ARY TV. 
This strange turn of events aside, Mr. Sehbai ran this web portal for quite some time and shut it down just before returning to Pakistan. South Asia Tribune gave space to many right wing journalists who have been traditionally pro-establishment, pro-army and anti India. The news character SAT displayed on web coincided with first and third variable, i.e., pro-establishment and anti-India, but strangely enough, like all other traditional proponents of army, (e.g., Shirin Mazari, Naseem Zehra, Roedad Khan, Hameed Gul, etc) Mr Sehbai also followed the same course. 
On SAT's masthead, it was claimed that its a web Newspaper for investigative reporting. Probably that was the reason why an extreme right wing reporter Ansar Abbasi was groomed by it and used to be given quite a handsome space. Many former army officers including Mr A. H. Amin, the author of the following post, were also among those who came up with many "investigative" reports in those days, religiously being posted on SAT. The interesting thing was, majority of these "investigative" reports did not mention verifiable source or authentic references / citations. 
Although following story does not tell us anything about basic information like who filed the petition, who're the judges, it carries host of un-verified information about strongest most institution of Pakistan - the Army. Please be reminded, this was 2003 and Musharraf was all there without any potential and overt challenge from civil society, establishment, political sphere, judiciary and army itself. 
My question from Mr Nawaz Sharif and an independence judiciary is, will they call for an inquiry into this? Will the petition (if there's any) be taken up afresh? And if the charges are false, will Mr Sehbai and / or the author be tried for spreading false propaganda against the armed forces? 
People want to know sires, will you please answer?

 

By A.H. Amin
ISLAMABAD: The Lahore High Court in Pakistan is facing a legal and a practical dilemma: What to do with the petition which charge sheets the Pakistan Armed forces and lists details of massive kickbacks and corruption done by Generals, Air Marshals and Admirals.
The petition has been filed by a lawyer in public interest but its contents are so explosive, the High Court Judges cannot touch it. The LHC, under tremendous pressure of the Army regime, is almost helpless in even admitting or hearing the petition, let alone give a verdict against the Army.
The main charges mentioned in the petition include:
- Air Chief Marshal Abbas Khattak (retired) had received Rs180 million as kickbacks in the purchase of 40 old Mirage fighters
- Air Chief Marshal, Farooq Feroz Khan was suspected of receiving a five per cent commission on the purchase of 40 F-7 planes worth $271 million
- In 1996, the Army bought 1,047 GS-90s jeeps, at a cost of $20,889 per unit. The market value of a jeep then was only $13,000. According to the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), Pakistan’s main accountability organization, some senior Army officers made Rs. 510 million in the deal.
- One hundred and eleven Army men got 400 plots in Bahawalpur and Rahimyar Khan districts at throwaway prices, paying Rs. 47.50 per kanal (1/8th of a acre) as against the actual price of Rs15,000 to Rs20,000 (1US$=Rs. 56). Another 35,000 kanals were distributed among them.
- Six respondents got 400 kanals in the Punjab while former NAB chairman Lt. Gen Mohammad Amjad was allotted a two-kanal plot on the Sarwar Road in Lahore for just Rs. 800,000 - payable in installments over 20 years. The market value of this plot was Rs. 20 million.
- General Pervez Musharraf acquired a commercial plot worth Rs 20 million at DHA in Lahore for just Rs. 100,000, payable in 20 years. "As mentioned in the report of defense services director-general, a loss of Rs 5 billion was incurred due to such allotments."
- The Army awarded a contract for the purchase of 1,000 Hino trucks at $40,000 per unit while the local Gandhara Industries had offered trucks of the same specification for $25,000 a piece. In the purchase of 3,000 Land Rover jeeps in 1995, Army officials allegedly received around Rs. 2 billion as kickbacks.
- The Army management at WAPDA raised the power tariff 13 times during the last three years besides purchasing electric meters at Rs. 1,050 a piece against the open market price of Rs. 456, causing a loss of Rs 1.65 billion to the national exchequer.
- A former military regime sold the Pak-Saudi Fertilizers for Rs. 7 billion and earned a Rs 2 billion commission on the deal.
- In 1996, the Pakistan Navy spent Rs. 13 million on installing air-conditioners at the Islamabad Golf Club without any justification.
Apart from this petition some other major scams involving serving or ex members of the military junta are as follows:
- Ex Army chief General Jahangir Karamat took kickbacks of more than US$ 20 Million from Ukrainian tank company for purchase of 300 Ukrainian tanks for Pakistan Army through a middleman named as Colonel Mahmood , a brother tank corps officer of Karamat . Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif sent the present chief of the WAPDA Major General Zulfiqar, then serving in ISI, to Ukraine and Azerbaijan to investigate the scam.
- General Zulfiqar compiled a complete report of the transaction and the bribes given. But the Army tried to buy him out by rewarding him with the post of WAPDA Chairman and promoting him to the rank of a three star General. The then Army Chief, General Jahangir Karamat was forced to resign, based on the threat that if he did not, he would be charged for corruption.
- Many road contracts were given to a firm Hasnain Construction company without any public tenders by the recently removed Railways and Communication minister General Qazi. The company, owned by a relative of General Pervez Musharraf’s son, was also awarded the lease of a lucrative real estate in Lahore for construction of a Golf Course under frontmanship of Palm Country Golf Club, Singapore. The relative of General Musharraf admitted publicly that he was working for a commission to use his contacts and influence for the company.
- Prime commercial land developed in Defence Housing Authority Karachi was leased at dirt heap rates to McDonalds operated by Amin Lakhani by the then Corps Commander, Karachi Lt. General Afzal Janjua.
- The Army’s coercive organ NAB struck various under the table deals with various individuals accused of high profile economic crimes in addition to arm twisting NAB defaulters, into joining the present government. These include the present Prime Minister Zafarullah Jamali and at least one fourth of all elected legislators.
Where does the military virtue of a defense outfit stand in these circumstances? Is 2003 not a year fit to publish its obituary? Our military virtue died, trampled below the treacherous wheels of overpriced military trucks and overpriced Chinese aircraft and defective Atlantique planes that crash in our waters because of dubious maintenance.
Yes all this has served one important development purpose. Sons of ex-subedars, ex-clerks and ex-assistant political agents have done well, climbing from relatively simple life styles to grand luxuries propelled by phenomenal assets. All came to clean the Augean stables and all departed richer. The only exception was General Yahya Khan who whatever his drawbacks at least did not have the mind of a petty shop keeper.
Clausewitz, the great philosopher of war described “Military Virtue” of an Army as the corporate spirit which forms the bond between bravery, enthusiasm and espirit de corps. Clausewitz further defined military virtue as a quality which drives an Army in a similar way as genius makes a military commander illustrious.
Military virtue in words of Clausewitz could be generated in two ways, i.e. by a succession of military campaigns and victories or by military training activity carried to the highest pitch. The more a general demanded of his troops in terms of dedicated military activity in peace, the surer he would be that his demands in war would be properly answered. In short military virtue is the fuel that is supposed to drive an Army in war.
With the above premise in mind and keeping in view our present history it can be safely concluded that military virtue of thePakistan Army as an institution witnessed erosion from 1958 once the party started that made sons of Risaldar majors and Assistant Political Agents progress into industrial tycoons. It was a joy ride. Men who had one green suit to wear, in the words of General Tajammul, became the tycoons of Pakistan. It was the beginning of prosperity for few and the beginning of the end of military virtue of a previously Spartan and clean military machine.
The second military junta of Pakistan was led by the only Army chief not from humble background and this ensured that the Pakistan Army was kept away from cheap consumerism and avaricious lust for real estate.
The second great dinner party started in 1979 when thanks to Soviet invasion of Afghanistan a heaven-sent opportunity arrived in shape of US military aid for the third military junta of Pakistan. Stingers were flown in by the big daddy for the obedient son and these were sold in the open market by silent soldiers. Thus new business empires were created. The Zia junta as a whole did roaring business and the result is that at least four major tycoons of Pakistan today including present commerce minister have direct links with the Zia junta.
Where does building 90 acres of a welfare colony known as Creek City with the cheapest shack for Rs. 6 million fit in? Did the military junta begin the occupation for such sublime purposes in 1958 or 1999? Where does developing 62 acres of land in prime commercial real estate in Islamabad fit in? Is this the business of a Navy that was miserably shut up in a mouse hole in Karachi Port in 1971 War? True that kickback may have been taken, but at least Admiral Mansur bought a good submarine for the Navy. But for whose welfare is the Navy undertaking a project 1500 kilometers from the nearest sea?
What began as an idealistic journey ends with the shady deals around creeks in Karachi which the Navy failed to defend in 1971 and a military junta which wants to rule this country for eternity.
And in this messy situation, the subservient Lahore High Court has been asked to sit on judgment with the sprawling mountains of charges, some even admitted publicly by the Army. God help the poor Mr. Justices of the superior court.
The writer is a retired Pakistan Army Officer and a Defence Analyst who has written a number of books on defence and security matters.

Seven Decades: Peeping through Indo-Pak History

Baaghi is committed to truth and bringing to its readers the analyses on historical events objectively and dispassionately. Those who are firm believers of state-authored textbook history in subcontinent are on higher risk of being offended and agitated. It is recommended to kindly treat history as a sacred thing which we owe to our posterity in purest of its form and content. With this view, Baaghi brings you some nuggets of events that led to the partition of Indian subcontinent. While some call it "independence", others may term it the saddest incidence of the history of region where the arms of this mighty subcontinent were chopped off. But dismemberment of United India was not the only tragedy people saw. It also brought a bloodshed, human misery and destruction with it, rarely found in recent history. 
Not one factor or actor of the time, however, could be accused of this gory episod. There are many. In fact all the elements of subcontinent's political mainstream, now seem to be accomplice in this, when we peep through history pages today. Here we reproduce two important documents from the archives of partition papers, resting peacefully in British Library, United Kingdom. For the ease of researchers, the document number has also been given whereby you can reach it from the Library.

Text of the Second Resolution passed by the All-India Muslim League Council at Bombay on 29 July 1946.

[R/3/1/35]
Resolution No. 2
Whereas the Council of the All-India Muslim League has resolved to reject the proposals embodied in the Statement of the Cabinet Delegation and the Viceroy, dated 16th May 1946, due to the intransigence of. the Congress on one hand, and the breach of faith with the Muslims by the British Government on the other; and
Whereas Muslim India has exhausted without success all efforts to find a peaceful solution of the Indian problem by compromise and constitutional means; and
Whereas the Congress is bent upon setting up Caste-Hindu Raj in India with the connivance of the British; and Whereas recent events have shown that power politics and not justice and fairplay are the deciding factors in India affairs; and
Whereas it has become abundantly clear that the Muslims of India would not rest contented with anything less than the immediate establishment of Independent and fully sovereign State of Pakistan and would resist any attempt to impose any constitution-making machinery or any constitution, long term or short term, or the setting up of any Interim Government at the Centre without the approval and consent of the Muslim League.
The Council of the All-India Muslim League is convinced that now the time has come for the Muslim Nation to resort to Direct Action to achieve Pakistan, to assert their just rights, to vindicate their honour and to get rid of the present British slavery and the contemplated future Caste-Hindu domination.
This Council calls upon the Muslim Nation to stand to a man behind their sole representative and authoritative organisation, the All-India Muslim League, and to be ready for every sacrifice.
This Council directs the Working Committee to prepare forthwith a programme of Direct Action to carry out the policy enunciated above and to organise the Muslims for the coming struggle to be launched as and when necessary.
As a protest against and in token of their deep resentment of the attitude of the British, this Council calls upon the Mussalmans to renounce forthwith the titles conferred upon them by the alien Government.

Having read the above Resolution, it would be interesting for the readers to go through following secret report that was submitted to the then Viceroy, Lord Wavell. This report covers the event of a massacre that followed the above resolution and the Direct Action Day. According to newspaper reports (Archives …) the post Direction Action events rendered around 4000 people killed and more than 100,000 displaced in the West Bengal especially Calcutta, in the wake of worst communal violence, termed as Great Calcutta Kilings. Sir John Burrow wrote this report with the perspective of British Governor of Bengal, and in quite detail. For the purpose of brevity, the report has been extracted by the British Library as under:

An extract of a secret report written on 22 August 1946 to the Viceroy Lord Wavell, from Sir Frederick John Burrows, concerning the Calcutta riots.

[IOR: L/P&J/8/655 f.f. 95, 96-107]
Secret
Calcutta
22nd August 1946

Dear Lord Wavell,
The series of telegrams, beginning with No.192 of August 16th, will have kept you apprised from day to day of the board outline of the appalling disturbances that have occurred in Calcutta. In this letter I am attempting to give a fuller picture of the setting, the course of events, and my preliminary conclusions. It is too soon to expect a very accurate account even of the disturbances themselves, far less to attempt a balanced judgement either of the causes of the riots or the wisdom of the measures taken to quell them. I shall try to be as objective as possible, and shall in particular exclude all reference to food and relief, (about which I shall address you separately as soon as possible), and to the repercussions on my Ministry. I am sending a copy of this letter to Pethick-Lawrence by safe hand on a York plane.
2. The setting. Omitting the more remote causes of the riots – the long struggle for power between Hindus and Muslims, in which Calcutta is a focal point, the weakening of our authority which is an inevitable consequence of our impending departure, the dislocation of the normal life of Calcutta by war and famine, and the presence of a Muslim Ministry in a predominantly Hindu city – the proximate cause was the resolution of the Council of the All-India Muslim League passed at Bombay on July 29th, calling on 'the Muslim nation to resort to direct action to achieve Pakistan', and the consequent fixing of August 15th as 'Direct Action Day'. I enclose a cutting from the "Star of India" of August 9th – it was repeated in subsequent issues till the 13th – giving the programme for 'Direct Action Day' in Calcutta.
3. The decision of my Ministry to declare a holiday under the Negotiable Instructions Act on August 16th has been a matter of some controversy. …… It is easy to be wise after the event and to say that the trouble would not have occurred if there had not been a holiday, "for Satan finds some mischief still, for idle hands to do". I disagree; many of the mischief-makers were people who would have had idle hands anyhow. If shops and markets had been generally open, I believe that there would have been even more looting and murder than there was; the holiday gave the peaceable citizens the chance of staying at home. There was an adjournment motion in the Legislative Council on August -15th about the declaration of a holiday. The Chief Minister, defending the decision, said that though the Muslims would observe the day peacefully and in a disciplined manner, there was always a danger of conflict arising; Congressmen had in the past enforced hartals by violence, and Muslims might be tempted to follow their example, which in the present political atmosphere was bound to five rise to communal conflict. It was to minimize the risk of such conflicts that he had declared a holiday. ……
4. As regards the probabilities of trouble and its possible extent, we found it extremely difficult to arrive at any confident appreciation in advance. Outwardly both major parties and also the independent Schedule Caste leaders, who had announced their intention to support the Muslim protest, had emphasised the necessity of keeping the peace. On the other hand the atmosphere was admittedly explosive and we realised – and I impressed it on my Chief Minister and all his colleagues – that the League were playing with fire. ……
5. Narrative of events. ……
6. Friday, August 16th. Even before 10 o'clock Police Headquarters had reported that there was excitement throughout the city, that shops were being forced to close, and that there were many reports of stabbing and throwing of stones and brickbats. The trouble had already assumed the communal character which it was to retain throughout. At that time it was mainly in the northern half of the city. (Later reports indicate that the Muslims were in an aggressive mood from early in the day and that their processions were well armed with the lathis, iron rods and missiles. Their efforts to force Hindu shops to close as they passed through the streets were greeted with showers of brickbats from the roofs above – indicating that the Hindus were also not unprepared for trouble – and from this sort of exchange of missiles, matters soon degenerated into arson, looting and murder). The situation deteriorated during the forenoon and at 2.40 p.m. the Chief Secretary rang up my Secretary to say that the position had become so serious that he supported the request of the Commissioner of Police that the Army should be called in at once in aid of the civil power. …… Ten minutes later the Commissioner of Police reported that the Chief Minister had already agreed to the calling in of troops. He added that the Police had used tear-smoke on crowds frequently and that the situation was bad in Harrison Road, Wellington Square and Corporation Street. ……
……
Yours sincerely,
(Sgd.) F. J. Burrows.
His Excellency Field Marshal the Right Hon'ble Viscount Wavell, G.C.B., G.H.S.I., G.H.I.E., C.M.G., M.C.
Viceroy and Governor-General of India, The Viceroy's House, New Delhi.